Arthur Miller :: essays research papers

Figure it out. Work a lifetime to pay for a house. You finally own it, and theres no unrivalled to exsert in it. This line was from the 1949 play Death of a Sales composition. In his proto(prenominal) eld milling machine wrote plays, but n single of them were produced. Death of a Salesman was non his first success, but was still widely admired. He grew to become star of the centurys undischargedest American dramatists. However this title was not easily achieved. After growing up in Harlem and working the Brooklyn navy blue Yard to becoming a Pulitzer Prize winner, Arthur miller is held with high respect. Miller had a lifelong dream. That dream was to become a famous playwright. With a lot of hard times and struggles, he reached his goal.Miller went through college with umteen failed and unpublished plays. Still, he neer gave up hope. Finally he get one success which kept him on the Broadway stage for several decades to come. Arthur Miller is a New York born American play wright who developed a reputation by dealing with political and moral issues through his plays. However, this is sightly the tip of the iceberg with it comes to the story of Arthur Miller. Arthur Miller was a good man, and with a good man comes character strengths. He always put onward the effort to judge a man by his rightful posture and his fair play. He also attempted to judge a man by his moral sanity and his welfare of the community (Foner and Garraty, 1). Miller never judged someone based upon a first impression. He made great attempts to know people thoroughly in front finally judging them. This was one of the greater strengths he posses in life. This helped him build the reputation that stuck with him over the years and that he became known for.However, Miller had a contradicting weakness along with his strength. He had an eagerness to express his judgement, which became a downfall for him. This one weakness antedate to showing his views and opinions openly. This often interrupted the more subtle interplay between affectionate and psychological ways that others were accustom too (Foner and Garraty, 2). Miller was good in giving it time to accurately know a person before judging him, but often showed his views too eagerly, which did not come make well to the public.In all the years Miller wrote plays, he had one goal in mind when he wrote.